› Forums › Conferences › Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association › Zoo/Hope/Carthage
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 5, 2007 at 5:56 pm #12776
El Duderino
MemberHas anyone looked at Carthage’s roster? They have 29 men and 35 women. Thats 64 people, plus however many coaches they bring along with them. Combine that with Hope’s 25 men and 29 women, and Zoo’s 20 men and 22 women, and thats a big-ass meet.
So the question is this: Who thought it was a good idea to have a meet with this many people at K’s pool? Its barely big enough to hold regular dual meets, let alone tri-meets with 160 swimmers. And before you old timers chime in, yes, I know Hornet Natatorium held MIAAs in 1993 – anyone know how many swimmers were at that meet? -
November 5, 2007 at 6:50 pm #40200
silentp
MemberMy sophomore year K hosted a three team meet also. Calvin and Alma came down. I’m not sure that counts, but it was a double-dual.
Unfortunately Coach was so busy paying attention to the lineup for the Calvin meet that he never changed or exhibitioned anything for the Alma-dual and the final score was 212-37.
What’s interesting about this location choice is that although Kalamazoo is “between” both Carthage and Hope, they both have pools with more deck and pool space than K.
-
November 5, 2007 at 7:03 pm #40201
Low Tide
MemberMake Hope watch the meet from the diving well viewing window — plenty of space down there!!
-
November 5, 2007 at 8:06 pm #40202
Milhouse
MemberHey, I bet you didn’t know that Kzoo hosted MIAAs in 1993. They brought in extra bleachers and set them up on the pool deck under the scoreboard. Some teams had to change in the locker rooms across the street. And some spectators even got a bird’s-eye view from the special viewing area concealed by the ceiling tiles.
-
November 5, 2007 at 8:22 pm #40203
miller
MemberI was there at 1993 MIAAs. It was incredibly crowded, but worked out just fine. I’m sure a tri-meet will be ok too.
-
November 7, 2007 at 6:21 pm #40204
Stingray
Memberwow, so ya’ll swam MIAAs in ’93 with no warmdown pool? You old timers are so hardcore. (I’m very serious about this, I’m a big baby when I don’t have a warmdown pool).
-
November 7, 2007 at 6:33 pm #40205
-
November 7, 2007 at 7:00 pm #40206
Low Tide
MemberThat was a fast conference meet, as well. Just about all the pool records at the K natatorium are still from that meet.
-
November 7, 2007 at 10:03 pm #40207
iamdonovan
MemberYeah, you can see just how many at K-swimming.net…
-
November 7, 2007 at 10:55 pm #40208
silentp
Member@miller wrote:
@Stingray wrote:
wow, so ya’ll swam MIAAs in ’93 with no warmdown pool? You old timers are so hardcore. (I’m very serious about this, I’m a big baby when I don’t have a warmdown pool).
Yes, and we were fine.
Warmdowns are overrated. ๐I thought the showers served as both warmup and warmdown facilities?
Also, isn’t this better in the long run? I mean, if you went slow, 5 years later you could tell all your buddies how much faster you would have gone with a good warmup or warmdown. Those of us who had warmdown options cannot use this excuse and have to be more creative… like blaming Global Warming.
-
November 7, 2007 at 11:20 pm #40209
SwexasTim
Memberor gps systems that direct you into a lake.
-
November 8, 2007 at 4:19 am #40210
iamdonovan
MemberGlobal warming ruins everything… if it weren’t for global warming, pool temperatures would be cooler, which leads to swimming faster… instead, we have to swim in water that’s better used for aquaerobics (or whatever) for old people at the YMCA.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.