› Forums › General › National Championships › Women’s Day Three Finals
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 10, 2007 at 11:03 pm #12445
neswim
MemberSecond heat of 1650 is off….Arad is one to watch. Hasn’t swum many 1650s so is swimming…this is a relatively weak field at the top compared to last year so she could win it this afternoon. I do think she’ll go under 17:20.
-
March 10, 2007 at 11:17 pm #36476
neswim
MemberDanielle Arad….17:12…..that should be good enough for top five…possible to three.
-
March 11, 2007 at 12:58 am #36477
neswim
MemberYep….Kenyon 1, 2 and 5 in the mile!!!!
-
March 11, 2007 at 1:37 am #36478
neswim
MemberWebsite does not have updated results….willl post here.. the 100 free is done and will giet places….
-
March 11, 2007 at 1:41 am #36479
swimkin
MemberWhat happened to the 100 free finals?
-
March 11, 2007 at 1:48 am #36480
neswim
MemberIts not up to date….through 200 breast but the point totals don’t make sense through Event 17…..question is whether where is Denison in relation to Emory? Anyway score this manually?
-
March 11, 2007 at 3:02 am #36481
neswim
MemberWell the first places are set….Kenyon, Amherst, Emory, Denison, Calvin…now the only thing to swim for his pride.
NESCAC….can Amherst take Kenyon? I think they might slip to third…what about it?
-
March 11, 2007 at 3:32 am #36482
neswim
MemberSwimmer of the meet is::::Sasser
Coach of the meet is…Nick Nichols of Amherst
Great performance by both the swimmer and coach
Nick is doing a terrific job and glad to see the recognition come his way.
Sorry I didn’t get the diver of the meet.
-
March 11, 2007 at 4:12 am #36483
My Spoons Too Big
MemberInteresting that they wouldn’t spread the wealth and give it to someone else (he won last year). Calvin did have the help of its diver(s) to get into 4th place, but three national records for Amherst isn’t bad at all. Also, four of their girls made the big heat at one point or another (Sasser, Stern 3X, Pettersen 2X, Ramsey once).
This was an incredibly fast women’s meet. Watch those cuts plunge dramatically next season.
-
March 11, 2007 at 2:12 pm #36484
Nescacfan
Member@My Spoon’s Too Big! wrote:
Interesting that they wouldn’t spread the wealth and give it to someone else (he won last year). Calvin did have the help of its diver(s) to get into 4th place, but three national records for Amherst isn’t bad at all. Also, four of their girls made the big heat at one point or another (Sasser, Stern 3X, Pettersen 2X, Ramsey once).
This was an incredibly fast women’s meet. Watch those cuts plunge dramatically next season.
I think that Nichols was the right choice. The psyche sheet predicted the following scores without diving[actual scores]
Kenyon 536 [498]
Denison 333 [239]
Emory 286 [261, relay DQ realy hurt]
Calvin 260 [251 but about 40 points in diving]
Amherst 232 [290]Amherst’s 10 swimmers exhibited the biggest improvement of the top 5 teams. It wasn’t Sasser who improved upon her seed times; it was everyone else.
-
March 11, 2007 at 2:44 pm #36485
ajp
MemberI don’t know why the scores aren’t posted anywhere, but those scores are incorrect. I threw away my sheet, but I know that Emory was 296, Calvin was 284, and Denison was around 272.
Amherst cracked 300. It seems like all the posted scores aren’t including points from the 400 free relay.
-
March 11, 2007 at 5:07 pm #36486
littlethreefan
MemberThe final team standings can be seen here:
http://www.ncaasports.com/swimming/womens/recaps/d3_team/2007Amherst scored 320 points.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.