Petersen/Newton - d3swimming

This topic is empty.

Viewing 8 reply threads

Author

Posts
- February 20, 2007 at 6:51 pm #12364
  
  Anonymous
  Member
  
  Seems like these guys have 4 choices at NCAAs. 500/1650/400IM/200free. Obviously they will battle it out again in the 500, but what else will they swim? Petersen hasn’t swam the IM before but went 3:58 alreadyt his year which will be up there. Newton is also that fast in it. Both have legitimate shots at the 200 free (after Curtis). Both are ranked high in the mile also. I think they have the best shots at the 500/400IM definitely. The mile there’s apossibility that neither of them finish in the top 2. Seems like Petersen would place top 2 in the 200…what do you guys think?
- February 20, 2007 at 6:55 pm #35548
  
  N Dynamite
  Member
  
  I’m guessing 500/1650 then probably 400 IM. They don’t want to do the 400 IM and 200 the same day that they’ll be on the 800 FR. That’s a lot of swimming for one day
- March 3, 2007 at 1:19 am #35549
  
  Anonymous
  Member
  
  I was looking at another page…people say Dunn will dominate. Is anyone concerned that he was lapped by peterson and borland at NCACs? I mean 16:30, are you kidding me? Even unshaved, I’m sure the other 2 weren’t shaved either. I’m not counting him out by any means. I just think that domination is the wrong term.
- March 3, 2007 at 1:27 am #35550
  
  Anonymous
  Member
  
  I agree that Dunn is shaky. Dunn brings in a ton of points if at the top of his game, this could spell trouble for Kenyon. Anyway I also think it’s ridiculous that Peterson isn’t mentioned in this. He’s a definite contender. I think it will be between Peterson,Dunn,Borland…if Dunn’s not ready then Peterson vs. Borland. Wouldn’t be the first time KC freshman surprises for a win in the mile. This will be a good race. In other words, Dunn will not dominate no matter what.
- March 3, 2007 at 1:37 am #35551
  
  silentp
  Member
  
  I am willing to bet you will both eat those words after NCAAs are over.
- March 3, 2007 at 4:46 am #35552
  
  N Dynamite
  Member
  
  @Anonymous wrote:
  
  I agree that Dunn is shaky. Dunn brings in a ton of points if at the top of his game, this could spell trouble for Kenyon. Anyway I also think it’s ridiculous that Peterson isn’t mentioned in this. He’s a definite contender. I think it will be between Peterson,Dunn,Borland…if Dunn’s not ready then Peterson vs. Borland. Wouldn’t be the first time KC freshman surprises for a win in the mile. This will be a good race. In other words, Dunn will not dominate no matter what.
  
  @2006 Psyche Sheet wrote:
  
  6) ( 301) DUNN, ERIC FR KENYON 15:51.76
  
  @2006 NCAA results wrote:
  
  1 Dunn, Eric FR Kenyon 15:51.76 15:22.21 20
  
  Yeah, he only dropped 29 second at Nationals and finished over 9 seconds ahead of everyone else. He’ll probably suck this year
- March 3, 2007 at 5:39 am #35553
  
  Chris Knight
  Member
  
  And he’s only seeded 15 seconds ahead of the field.
- March 3, 2007 at 5:58 am #35554
  
  Anonymous
  Member
  
  so by your logic he went 15:51 at conference last year, dropped 29 secs for a 15:22…then this year he went 16:30 so he should be 16:01? i agree with the others, hes not the same as when he went 15:29 for his seed earlier. i predict 15:25 wins and about 4 people could do it.
- March 18, 2007 at 7:34 am #35555
  
  N Dynamite
  Member
  
  @Anonymous wrote:
  
  I agree that Dunn is shaky. Dunn brings in a ton of points if at the top of his game, this could spell trouble for Kenyon. Anyway I also think it’s ridiculous that Peterson isn’t mentioned in this. He’s a definite contender. I think it will be between Peterson,Dunn,Borland…if Dunn’s not ready then Peterson vs. Borland. Wouldn’t be the first time KC freshman surprises for a win in the mile. This will be a good race. In other words, Dunn will not dominate no matter what.
  
  Hey, great call. By the way, Dunn was under 4:00 in the IM.
Author

Posts

Viewing 8 reply threads

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.