Manadou??

Forums General General Manadou??

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 21 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #12939
      CaseBrst10
      Member
    • #42722
      griz
      Member

      wow.

    • #42723
      Colbybr
      Member

      Yeah not a great moment for the sport.

    • #42724
      Low Tide
      Member

      Actually… it could be one of the greatest moments ever for the sport.
      Seriously.

    • #42725
      The Treat
      Member

      @Low Tide wrote:

      Actually… it could be one of the greatest moments ever for the sport.
      Seriously.

      the pictures are hardly worse than what most girls wear to the beach, swim practice, or out for a saturday night. sure it sucks that they were released against her will, but it could have been a LOT worse.

    • #42726

      I can’t get that link to load. Anyone have a different one?

    • #42727

      @The Treat wrote:

      the pictures are hardly worse than what most girls wear to the beach, swim practice, or out for a saturday night.

      You must’ve followed the same broken link as Chapel then. The pictures I saw were not something you’d wear to the beach (unless you were in France where nude beaches are common). I don’t know what you saw, Treat, but it surely wasn’t the backside full nudity and shower scene I was linked to….

    • #42728

      @Low Tide wrote:

      Actually… it could be one of the greatest moments ever for the sport.
      Seriously.

      I suppose that the flesh hungry, pubescent boys of the world will be pining for a glimpse and some hott swimmer tail. Maybe it’ll be enough to get them to join the sport….

    • #42729
      Low Tide
      Member

      A sex scandal with two attractive athletes in plain jane, vanilla, other-wise “boring” swimming? Right before an Olympic year? Bring on the attention! 8)

    • #42730

      @Low Tide wrote:

      A sex scandal with two attractive athletes in plain jane, vanilla, other-wise “boring” swimming? Right before an Olympic year? Bring on the attention! 8)

      That chick has the hairline of a 40 year old man. Couple the thin receding hair, 10 finger forehead, with those beady little eyes, and you have a very unattractive woman. Sorry. But I’m a sell.

    • #42731
      The Treat
      Member

      @Rustie Gustie wrote:

      @The Treat wrote:

      the pictures are hardly worse than what most girls wear to the beach, swim practice, or out for a saturday night.

      You must’ve followed the same broken link as Chapel then. The pictures I saw were not something you’d wear to the beach (unless you were in France where nude beaches are common). I don’t know what you saw, Treat, but it surely wasn’t the backside full nudity and shower scene I was linked to….

      no, what i’m saying is that the amount of her body shown really isn’t much more than a bikini or a low cut dress. sure she is nude, but she’s covered up on the front and all you see from the back is a butt. i dont know about anyone else, but i dont consider the butt as that bad to show. a butt is a butt and you can tell just as much about the butt from a swimsuit. you just see some extra skin. maybe it’s cause im younger, but i stick by my statement, it isn’t that bad and it could have been much worse. i can definitely see her sponsors overreacting.

    • #42732
      CaseBrst10
      Member

      I’m not sure what pictures you’ve seen, but I can agree with some of the other posters, there are some much more graphic photos than just the one of her facing the door

    • #42733
      JHU84
      Member

      @Mac of the MIAC wrote:

      @Low Tide wrote:

      A sex scandal with two attractive athletes in plain jane, vanilla, other-wise “boring” swimming? Right before an Olympic year? Bring on the attention! 8)

      That chick has the hairline of a 40 year old man. Couple the thin receding hair, 10 finger forehead, with those beady little eyes, and you have a very unattractive woman. Sorry. But I’m a sell.

      maybe she is using the same juice as the baseball boys and marion jones??????

    • #42734
      swim5599
      Member

      We are not really going to get into the PED’s discussion again on here are we?

    • #42735

      @The Treat wrote:

      no, what i’m saying is that the amount of her body shown really isn’t much more than a bikini or a low cut dress. sure she is nude, but she’s covered up on the front and all you see from the back is a butt. i dont know about anyone else, but i dont consider the butt as that bad to show. a butt is a butt and you can tell just as much about the butt from a swimsuit. you just see some extra skin. maybe it’s cause im younger, but i stick by my statement, it isn’t that bad and it could have been much worse. i can definitely see her sponsors overreacting.

      I see what you’re saying, Treat. It’s not like the Tommy & Pam video, but rather some fairly harmless nude photos that reveal nothing more than some cleavage and her butt cheeks.

    • #42736
      Colbybr
      Member

      @Rustie Gustie wrote:

      @The Treat wrote:

      no, what i’m saying is that the amount of her body shown really isn’t much more than a bikini or a low cut dress. sure she is nude, but she’s covered up on the front and all you see from the back is a butt. i dont know about anyone else, but i dont consider the butt as that bad to show. a butt is a butt and you can tell just as much about the butt from a swimsuit. you just see some extra skin. maybe it’s cause im younger, but i stick by my statement, it isn’t that bad and it could have been much worse. i can definitely see her sponsors overreacting.

      I see what you’re saying, Treat. It’s not like the Tommy & Pam video, but rather some fairly harmless nude photos that reveal nothing more than some cleavage and her butt cheeks.

      Ummm I dont know what photos you guys saw but there are close up photos of her nude vagina among them. So not just butt cheeks and cleavage. There is also one of her face and an unidentified penis.

    • #42737

      Seriously, need a link.

    • #42738
      wonderboy33
      Member

      Yeah, why am I not seeing these pictures? I need a change from the usual porn.

    • #42739
      Derek
      Member

      Please don’t post that link here. It will just create the need for me to delete it.

    • #42740
      The Treat
      Member

      @Colbybr wrote:

      @Rustie Gustie wrote:

      @The Treat wrote:

      no, what i’m saying is that the amount of her body shown really isn’t much more than a bikini or a low cut dress. sure she is nude, but she’s covered up on the front and all you see from the back is a butt. i dont know about anyone else, but i dont consider the butt as that bad to show. a butt is a butt and you can tell just as much about the butt from a swimsuit. you just see some extra skin. maybe it’s cause im younger, but i stick by my statement, it isn’t that bad and it could have been much worse. i can definitely see her sponsors overreacting.

      I see what you’re saying, Treat. It’s not like the Tommy & Pam video, but rather some fairly harmless nude photos that reveal nothing more than some cleavage and her butt cheeks.

      Ummm I dont know what photos you guys saw but there are close up photos of her nude vagina among them. So not just butt cheeks and cleavage. There is also one of her face and an unidentified penis.

      ok, i just saw the whole set and i take back what i said. i just saw two photos from the original site when i made my previous statement.

    • #42741
      Derek
      Member

      It really doesn’t matter what the pictures actually look like, what matters is what the media chooses to say about them. Treat’s experience is a perfect example.

    • #42742

      Having seen the full set of photos, I’m going to say that they were taken by Laure herself. Several of the photos (the racier ones) have the classic “one arm outstretched” look to them.

Viewing 21 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.