› Forums › General › National Championships › Emory…
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
February 9, 2007 at 3:45 am #12296
DonCheadle
MemberThe great times that they put up in December are not looking so hot now. Callam in particular is just a little bit shakey because depending on TT’s their 3:25 may not make it in (though I expect a solid 100 fly tomorrow that would erase this).
Ehh, all in all they’ll be fine. THe bigger picture though is that D3 has gotten a lot faster.
-
February 9, 2007 at 4:50 am #34829
PioneerSwimming
MemberEmory has 15 guys that are a lock to be in the meet, so they will swim all relays. It all depends of course on the right combo of guys in the meet, but looks like they’ll be fine.
-
February 9, 2007 at 3:05 pm #34830
DonCheadle
Member50.8 is not a lock in the 100 fly. Nor is a a 1:53.7 in the 200 IM or 4:06 im the 400 IM
-
February 9, 2007 at 3:32 pm #34831
swim5599
MemberI know they are not worried about it but their women’s 400 medley was dq’d last night.
-
February 9, 2007 at 6:00 pm #34832
facenorth
Member1:53.7 is safe in the 200 IM I would think.
-
February 9, 2007 at 7:13 pm #34833
wickedfoolish
Member@swim5599 wrote:
I know they are not worried about it but their women’s 400 medley was dq’d last night.
along with 3 other relays. i think they need worry about sending a full 18. Their bubble 200 freestylers have yet to show something. Also, I’m fairly certain that 154 low will make the meet. Does anyone think 58.0 will make it? The way everyone is swimming, i dont think it will and everyone has to go 57.
-
February 10, 2007 at 4:11 am #34834
Cookie Monster
MemberThe team seemed a lot more excited tonight. Mary Tripp gets into Nationals with a leadoff split and DiMarco can be considered safe now with the 800 free relay and two B cuts with a possible third tomorrow.
It was great to see the relays at the end a race to the finish between Wash U and Emory again. Wash U’s relay is even faster despite Triebe and Slavik having graduated!
-
February 10, 2007 at 5:05 am #34835
RhymeAndReason
Member@Cookie Monster wrote:
The team seemed a lot more excited tonight. Mary Tripp gets into Nationals with a leadoff split and DiMarco can be considered safe now with the 800 free relay and two B cuts with a possible third tomorrow.
It was great to see the relays at the end a race to the finish between Wash U and Emory again. Wash U’s relay is even faster despite Triebe and Slavik having graduated!
Even faster? They were 6:42 at nationals last year… do you mean at conference last year, or…?
-
February 10, 2007 at 6:19 pm #34836
swim5599
MemberLeckey 1:40.2 on the end. They will make some noise in that relay in a couple of weeks
-
February 10, 2007 at 9:57 pm #34837
silentp
MemberThose Emory swimmers who are in the meet either on relays or individually only rested this week, no longer, so they will be there when it counts for them, NCAAs.
-
February 10, 2007 at 11:15 pm #34838
Cookie Monster
Member@RhymeAndReason wrote:
@Cookie Monster wrote:
The team seemed a lot more excited tonight. Mary Tripp gets into Nationals with a leadoff split and DiMarco can be considered safe now with the 800 free relay and two B cuts with a possible third tomorrow.
It was great to see the relays at the end a race to the finish between Wash U and Emory again. Wash U’s relay is even faster despite Triebe and Slavik having graduated!
Even faster? They were 6:42 at nationals last year… do you mean at conference last year, or…?
As opposed to conference last year – they were 6:52.
-
February 12, 2007 at 11:12 pm #34839
iswimalottayards
MemberLast year nobody on that 800 relay was rested for UAA’s, whereas this year everyone was. That is the only reason it was faster this year.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.