› Forums › General › National Championships › Day 2 Prelims
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:10 pm #12474
OutsideSmoker27
MemberFOUR DQ’s in one heat of the 2MR?!?!?!?!?!
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:14 pm #36893
Psimon3
MemberFive total, Washington & Lee, Hope, Kalamazoo, Gustavus, UW- LA Crosse
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:15 pm #36894
Rudy Shingle
MemberSomething needs to be said. I don’t beleive that 4 teams jumped in a single heat.
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:18 pm #36895
swim5599
MemberKalamazoo’s dq man that hurts like hell. What a race we are going to see tonight. behnke swam free for Denison so he will be pulled tonight. So I see them going a second faster.
ANy chance Olaf wins this thing?
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:28 pm #36896
NCACDork
MemberI would say look for Kenyon to go .5 faster tonight… so Olaf would have to cut .7 off their time. Anybody familiar with them and know who could do that for Olaf?
I don’t really see it happening.
25.2 is really fast by Zarins. Anybody know the fastest 50 BR split ever?
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:29 pm #36897
NCACDork
MemberAlso saw Espinona from Kzoo was 25.2 as well! Was he the one who false started perhaps?
Still – outstanding for a freshman.
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:29 pm #36898
swim5599
MemberYeah I believe it is Boss in the 24.5 or 24.6 range most of the guys in here know for sure
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:31 pm #36899
NCACDork
MemberGood time in the first heat from Borland of KC (4:03).
Is it true that Dunn was under 4:00 last year? He is seeded as a 4:04.
3:58 perhaps?
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:32 pm #36900
swim5599
MemberI am thinking he might be even faster then that. 3:57 or so. We are going to see Stoyel swim for the first time this morning. He will be in the 4:02 range as well
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:33 pm #36901
Rudy Shingle
Memberfonsy has been 24.8 to hands in the 400 medley before so that is kind of slower then we thought
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:34 pm #36902
scoles08
MemberLook for Westby to shave about three tenths off his fly split. Koch should be able to get a sub-20 split as well. It’ll be quite the race tonight. Wish I could be there.
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:34 pm #36903
CRUNCHYSOCK
MemberWhat is going on with the Medleys this year? Are that many teams jumping, or are teams getting DQ’d for bad turns, finishes or just cheating in general???
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:37 pm #36904
PioneerSwimming
MemberIs there any truth to what was posted on collegeswimming.com that lanes 1-4 are seeing all the good swims while 5-8 are gettinig dogged?
Is there a flaw with the pool?
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:37 pm #36905
swim5599
Member3:57 for Dunn I was right on the money. Marschall was 3:58
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:38 pm #36906
OutsideSmoker27
MemberDunn was under 4:00 in the 4IM…..again.
E. Dunn = E. Rushton?
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:38 pm #36907
Duck
Memberfonsy has been 24.8 to hands in the 400 medley before so that is kind of slower then we thought
I talked with Cheadle, who is at the meet. He reiterated Espinosa’s relay start was the slowest he has ever seen. Ellis (Kzoo) was swimming next to Hagemeyer (Gustavus) in the back leg — with Ellis finishing .22 ahead — and Espinosa entered the water after Mikkelson.
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:42 pm #36908
iamdonovan
MemberFonsy’s starts are, in fact, glacial. When his starts get fast, we can all start panicking, because that’ll mean there aren’t many glaciers left. Any word from Cheadle on the cause of all of these DQs? Is it the pads on the blocks, or what?
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:43 pm #36909
mbcoach
Memberwhat’s up with Treat of Amherst. Not swimming well at this meet.
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:48 pm #36910
Duck
MemberIs it the pads on the blocks, or what?
It’s the reaction pads, though he said McGlaston was downright sinful and Greiner was pretty obvious as well.
We both agreed these reaction pads need to start being used more than once a year (or done away with); this many DQs is ridiculous and hurts the meet.
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:51 pm #36911
swim5599
MemberPacker seeded at 51.8 in the fly just went 49.6 sick
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:56 pm #36912
mbcoach
Member2 in final heat for KC in the Fly
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:57 pm #36913
swim5599
Memberanyone surprised that Test just swam the 100 fly
-
March 16, 2007 at 4:57 pm #36914
iamdonovan
MemberApparently everyone agrees that reaction pads need to be used more or not at all… once just ain’t cuttin’ it. I think the NCAA needs to have someone monitor this site and harvest a bit of brainpower.
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:00 pm #36915
NCACDork
MemberOnce again I am disappointed in Byers’ performance. Also noticed that Emory is without a finalist in the fly.
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:01 pm #36916
swim5599
MemberYeah I am really surprised at Byers. ANyone know if he is sick or anything.
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:03 pm #36917
PioneerSwimming
MemberKenyon and Grove City have the pads, so they practice with them. They may have an advantage in that sense. Still, jumping: never an excuse.
My advice to my swimmers is always “Win it in the pool.” You are already getting the added momentum of a rolling start and arm swing, so why not make it safe? Look at the horrific consequence of not timing it right: in a big meet the team could lose the opportunity for up to 40 pts, as opposed to a slightly slower time, but still earning points. For a team as strong as KC to jump, when they know they are virtually assured of a top-8 seeding at night, it is somewhat inconceivable.
When Denison won the women’s meet in 2001, Parini’s instructions to the 400 FR were to stay nailed on the blocks. Any legal finish won the meet. He timed only the delay from hand-touch to foot-leave, and the difference was actually what it took to win the event. 2nd place in the relay, but the larger honor of National Team Championship.
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:12 pm #36918
mbcoach
Memberstoyel 56.7 – moving!
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:15 pm #36919
OutsideSmoker27
Member@PioneerSwimming wrote:
Kenyon and Grove City have the pads, so they practice with them. They may have an advantage in that sense.
You’re probably right, although I’m not so sure how much of a practical advantage it is, seeing as they both jumped yesterday.
As for RJPs in general, yeah, it would be nice if everyone used them all the time — or at least if all the conference meets did. I think the NCAA mandating something like that would be a fine idea (unrealistic, I know). But I don’t see a problem using them at nationals. Everyone knows they’re going to be using them. And I’m not sure it’s a rampant problem quite yet. I don’t remember there being much of an outcry last year about any of the relays (possibly there’s some amnesia going on here), and yesterday’s free relay turned out reasonably fine. If massive DQs show up in the 800 and 400 free relays, I might reconsider that opinion. Guess I’ll wait and see.
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:18 pm #36920
NCACDork
MemberGosselar 55.78 – Reallymoving.
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:24 pm #36921
PioneerSwimming
MemberKenyon: 3 in the Bigs in the 100 br. Amazing. And Zarins is in the bigs. Good for him!
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:30 pm #36922
mbcoach
MemberI think Coach Steen has gotta be happy with this AM as well.
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:34 pm #36923
swim5599
Memberyeah we have all talked about how Zarins struggles in the morning well if he does I could see 55.5 out of him tonight
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:36 pm #36924
Stevo
Memberwhy is Zarins always the breastroker on Kenyon’s medleys? It seems that Gosselar is having a better meet. I am pulling for Joey tonight, he is a good kid and having a great meet.
-
March 16, 2007 at 7:04 pm #36925
Anonymous
MemberByers has been battling the stomach flu as has Benhke.
-
March 16, 2007 at 7:19 pm #36926
N Dynamite
Member@PioneerSwimming wrote:
Kenyon and Grove City have the pads, so they practice with them. They may have an advantage in that sense. Still, jumping: never an excuse.
It didn’t help them yesterday
@PioneerSwimming wrote:My advice to my swimmers is always “Win it in the pool.” You are already getting the added momentum of a rolling start and arm swing, so why not make it safe? Look at the horrific consequence of not timing it right: in a big meet the team could lose the opportunity for up to 40 pts, as opposed to a slightly slower time, but still earning points. For a team as strong as KC to jump, when they know they are virtually assured of a top-8 seeding at night, it is somewhat inconceivable.
When Denison won the women’s meet in 2001, Parini’s instructions to the 400 FR were to stay nailed on the blocks. Any legal finish won the meet. He timed only the delay from hand-touch to foot-leave, and the difference was actually what it took to win the event. 2nd place in the relay, but the larger honor of National Team Championship.
As an Emory alum you may want to note that they were 9th in the 200 FR by .01, but their cumulative relay exchanges were well over .60 – they had two guys react over +.30. Following your advice cost them the big heat, eight points, and four trophies.
-
March 16, 2007 at 7:34 pm #36927
Chris Knight
Member@Duck wrote:
Is it the pads on the blocks, or what?
It’s the reaction pads, though he said McGlaston was downright sinful and Greiner was pretty obvious as well.
I talked to Tim in the lobby and he said that the pad measured him .01 under, I’m not sure how that’s “sinful.” I didn’t see him as early but then again my seat was pretty far away.
-
March 16, 2007 at 7:41 pm #36928
wickedfoolish
Memberhas anyone noticed that they dont have officials at the opposite end. from the stands, i have seen a few **possible** one hand turns (maybe they are just “fast”)
-
March 16, 2007 at 8:20 pm #36929
Vic
Member@wickedfoolish wrote:
has anyone noticed that they dont have officials at the opposite end. from the stands, i have seen a few **possible** one hand turns (maybe they are just “fast”)
It wouldn’t surprise me if there are one hand turns. During meets I often notice people doing one hand turns, but they are so fast about it that no one notices. Sometimes I wonder if the officials at the turn end are really paying attention.
-
March 16, 2007 at 9:05 pm #36930
DonCheadle
Member@Chris Knight wrote:
@Duck wrote:
Is it the pads on the blocks, or what?
It’s the reaction pads, though he said McGlaston was downright sinful and Greiner was pretty obvious as well.
I talked to Tim in the lobby and he said that the pad measured him .01 under, I’m not sure how that’s “sinful.” I didn’t see him as early but then again my seat was pretty far away.
Chris,
I saw it from the stands. That is all I am saying. .01 ?
IT definitely was NOT Fonsi who false started for Kzoo. Man, his starts are bad. Still, last night his 2nd 50 was under 30. Today he was 30.1 I still look for him to be around where I predicted yesterday (55.6)
Oh and the 200 Free, really interesting. There were tons of guys in the non-circle heats that made it back. Strange.
-
March 16, 2007 at 10:14 pm #36931
Milhouse
Member@Duck wrote:
We both agreed these reaction pads need to start being used more than once a year (or done away with); this many DQs is ridiculous and hurts the meet.
The obvious solution is for folks to not jump on their relay starts. If nothing else, the reaction pads add honesty to the results. But on the other hand, the use of pads hurts the teams that don’t get to practice with them on a regular basis. I’m sure there are plenty of D1 schools that have their own in stock, but they’re probably a bit harder to come by at the D3 level.
-
March 16, 2007 at 10:42 pm #36932
DonCheadle
Member@wickedfoolish wrote:
has anyone noticed that they dont have officials at the opposite end. from the stands, i have seen a few **possible** one hand turns (maybe they are just “fast”)
Not a one hand touch, but man Harris has great turns. Not walls (they are good) but he gets moviong in th other direction very quickly and fluidly.
-
March 16, 2007 at 11:41 pm #36933
-
March 16, 2007 at 11:42 pm #36934
swim5599
MemberWHo would not want a chance to swim on those big time medley relays?
-
March 16, 2007 at 11:49 pm #36935
RadAGator
Memberseriously….medley relays are the best events, ever.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.